Does the machinery hunger for more? 

The G-7 central bankers met in Jackson Hole, Wyoming, last weekend to discuss the “Structural Shifts in the Global Economy.”

At a meeting in Jackson Hole in 2019, G-7 bankers voted on the Going Direct Reset, which the World Economic Forum (WEF) calls “the Great Reset.” We all know what happened next – “structural shifts in the global economy” engineered with lockdowns and other disaster capitalism justified by health mandates. With the central bankers under pressure due to the success of the BRICS nations Summit in South Africa earlier this week, we are suddenly hearing new rumors of fall lockdowns. This comes at a time in which there is a serious push for censorship, and we are experiencing media manipulation throughout Europe and North America.  

What did the central bankers decide? And what does this mean in the context the World Health Organization’s (WHO) aggressive push to create a mechanism that can engineer central control and “structural shifts in the global economy” on an unprecedented scale?

The Pandemic Industry in action again

The WHO announced the EG.5 Initial Risk Evaluation on Aug. 9, indicating that “Based on the available evidence, the public health risk posed by EG.5 is evaluated as low at the global level, aligning with the risk associated with XBB.1.16 and the other currently circulating Variant of Interests (VOI) (…). While EG.5 has shown increased prevalence, growth advantage, and immune escape properties, there have been no reported changes in disease severity to date. While concurrent increases in the proportion of EG.5 and COVID-19 hospitalizations (lower than previous waves) have been observed in countries such as Japan and the Republic of Korea, no associations have been made between these hospitalizations and EG.5. …” followed by further risk surveillance details on EG.5, BA.2.86 variants on Aug. 17.

All this seemingly went unnoticed until the mainstream media jumped into action. In the usual manner, the media published hundreds of headlines repeating the risks associated with BA.6 and BA.2.86, thus spreading the name of Eris, the Greek goddess of strife, discord and chaos. 

NEW – Countless mainstream media outlets are now pushing “Eris”, a new “Covid variant” named by the WHO after the Greek goddess of discord and strife. (Aug.18. @Disclose TV)

Controversially enough, the latest COVID-19 Weekly Epidemiological Update issued by WHO indicates some uncertainties around Eris. One may wonder if they picked the wrong variant for fear mongering. Is Eris is already generating chaos or did it not “perform” to expectations? Is the groundwork being set to increase the level of surveillance or even to call for emergency based on unidentified risk level?

However, there is no refreshed data available on Eris, the top variant of interest. Overall it should not be difficult to find a variant that is already present in most of us and exaggerate its severity with the aligned media narrative the way it serves its purpose to the machinery, especially with the increased censorship (Aug. 25.) by Facebook, YouTube and other 17 main online platforms.

Picture 1

WHO – comforted by immunity, acting without transparency and accountability –  is positioned to define what surveillance techniques are to be used and how to interpret the results. Based on its own interpretation, WHO may define the risk associated and the countermeasures necessary to eliminate that risk. 
This pattern is all too familiar to those who have a comprehensive and factual view of the events of the past three years. Experienced and independent public health experts like Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg and Dr. David Bell, and legal experts like Dr. Silvia Behrendt and Philipp Kruse, LL.M have repeatedly warned against the implementation of the pandemic cycle that has no control mechanism and no oversight in place while the pharmaceutical industry is a key beneficiary. 

Although decisions made by individuals and institutions over the past three years have had profound impacts on society, many of which are likely to be negative, a proper evaluation is yet to be conducted to establish responsibilities and hold these people and institutions accountable.

The WHO and CDC announcements triggered the MSM to begin its fear mongering communications in perfect lockstep again. Regardless of the lack of substance in the headlines, news of the latest booster protecting all against” this variant was already announced to bring the immediate solution. (Note: It is known fact by now that these so called ‘vaccines’ were not event tested for efficiency to stop contagiousness.) Pharma, both Moderna and Pfizer, is bringing the new boosters in a good month to market (subject to approvals by relevant health authorities). They already know that the 60+ age group will be the focal point of the initial vaccination campaign.

Influenza season is coming

After the last three years, it will not be surprising that there was no mention of possible prophylactic treatments. One will not find them in the ‘Tripledemic’- pushing media. The new narrative urges people not only to take the boosters again for COVID but to take up the “regular” fall influenza and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) vaccines, all at the same time.

Picture 1

How could the EU Commission – or the White House – know in the spring of 2023 that just a few months later in October we would need mRNA c19 vaccines again? EMA has hurriedly approved one vaccine after another with local, highly incentivized manufacturers during the spring and summer. These approvals were done without proper review conducted of the available data, which demonstrates the harms caused by mRNA vaccinations. (See the long list of analysis of the EU’s PSUR published at CHD Europe website.) Independent scientific voices call for a moratorium on mRNA vaccinations due to the unknown and known risks.


While a new pandemic would allow the leading institutions to avoid accountability for the harmful impact of their previous decisions, it would also divert the attention away not only from the dramatically exceeding mortality rates, the failures from the previous so-called pandemic and the damages caused by the vaccines but also away from the power grab by institutions like WHO and UN, which are using the repeated methodology with the newly publicized global shock elements

Picture 2

Policy Brief 2 of Our [UN’s – ed.] Common Agenda: Strengthening the International Response to Complex Global Shocks– An Emergency Platform

We are coming to a test period.

Watch a related interview by The Epoch Times here.

Suggest a correction

Similar Posts